Sovershenstvo ot Ansel Adams

[W_z_rd]

Eto lish nebol`shoe kol-vo rabot Adamsa. Konechno, ego fotografii ne dlya monitora, po-nastoyashemu ocenit` ego rabot@ mozhno tol`ko na otpechatke sootvetstvuyushix razmerov.

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/early_morning_merced_river_yosemite_national_park_ california.jpg

http://masters-of-photography.com/images/full/adams/adams_aspens.jpg

http://www.anseladams.com/newstore/images/124LG.jpg

http://www.anseladams.com/newstore/images/114LG.jpg

http://www.anseladams.com/newstore/images/104LG.jpg

http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/adams/E23.jpg

http://masters-of-photography.com/images/full/adams/adams_central_park.jpg

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/clearing_storm_sonoma_county_hills_california.jpg

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/el_capitan_yosemite_national_park_california.jpg

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/frozen_lake_and_cliffs_sequoia_national_park_calif ornia.jpg

To be continued....

[W_z_rd]

Sovershenstvo ot Ansel Adams. Continued...

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/grass_in_rain_glacier_bay_national_park_alaska.jpg

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/leaves_frost_stump_october_morning_yosemite_nation al_park_california.jpg

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/pine_forest_in_snow_yosemite_national_park_califor nia.jpg

http://www.litillmathur.org/ansel_adams/images/road_after_rain_north_coast_california.jpg

http://www.usc.edu/schools/annenberg/asc/projects/comm544/library/images/534bg.jpg

http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/adams/view.jpg

http://www.anseladams.com/newstore/images/110LG.jpg

http://www.anseladams.com/newstore/images/105LG.jpg

[groul]

klassika!

[W_z_rd]

Originally posted by groul:
klassika!Da uzh... Poroy tyanet shvirut` kameru kuda podal`she, glyadya na etu krasotu - vse ravno nichego dazhe otdalenno poxozhego ne sdelat`...

[groul]

Ne vsyo tak ploxo.

Vo-pervyx pro. fotografy vybirayut dlya pokaza 1 fotku iz 200, ostalnye idut v musor.

Vo-vtoryx, pri nadlezhashej upornosti, podgotovke (teorii i praktike) i talante (pri etom ne obyazatelno kakom-to osobennom) mozhno dostich esli ne tex zhe, no xotya by blizkix rezultatov.

Drugoe delo, chto pochti nikto iz prisustvuyushix na etom forume ne zanimaetsya fotografiej professionalno (full time), po 8-10 chasov v den'.

[W_z_rd]

200 - eto eshe slishkom optimistichno :)
Vse eto konechno verno, ya i sam nemnogo vremeni trachu na eto delo. no dazhe luchshie prof. fotografi v kachestve ustupayut Adamsu, na moy vzglyad. ustupayut imenno v etom stremlenii k sovershestvovaniyu. Adams bil prosto unikalen v tom s kakoy tshatel`nostyu on podoxodil k viboru apparaturi dlya s'emki, mestu, vremeni, osvesheniyu, plenke, bumage, sposobu projavki, otpechatki, obrabotki. Ya videl mnogo rabot razlichnix professionalnix xudozhnikov. Mnogie s nim mogut sravnitsya s Adamsom v smisle xudozhestvennosti, no v plane texniki ch/b fotografii - nikogda.

[groul]

Hamadzain em. Ne isklyucheno, pravda, chto est' "demqer" o kotoryx ne znaem...

P.S. u menya brak: 999 out of 1000.

[W_z_rd]

Oho ! ti tak mnogo snimaesh :confused:
Karogha kan, bayts te dzhvar. B/W photon hima etqan popular chi.

[groul]

Cifrovaya kamera + dve karty na kotoroj pomeshaetsya po 163 kartinok razmerom ~2048x1500

t.e. mogu pozvolit' sebe roskosh sdelat' 100 snimkov odnogo obyekta v raznyx usloviyax i rakursax, i potom vybrat' luchshij kadr (esli on voobshe byvaet)

xotya po-moemu budet pravilnej ne poskupitsya, kupit' normalnuyu kameru s xoroshej optikoj, i vzyat' kakie nibud' kursy po fotografii. togda i kachestvennyx fotok budet bolshe.

cherno belaya fotografiya vse eshe aktualna, tak zhe kak i risunok karandashom ili skulptura. IMHO.

[W_z_rd]

A, nu cifrovaya - eto drugoe delo. A to razoritsya mozhno na plenke v takom kol-ve :)

Ya tozhe podumivayu kupit` cufrovuyu kameru potomu, chto vse ravno ya fotografii obrabativayu na PhSh, no nikak ne reshu v kakom cenovom diapazone vybirat`. Projavka i obrabotka plenki ochen` dorogo obxoditsya i esli ne zanimat`sya etim professional`no, to eto neopravdaanaya trata deneg. Samomu proyavlyat` cvetnuyu plenku nereal`no, tak chto nado perexodit` na BW, vidimo. Imenno potomu David Tolpin na BW snimaet, kstati.

[groul]

K sozhaleniyu nekotorye defecty cifry dazhe photoshop ne v sostoyanii ispravit'.

Chto kasaetsya razoritsya na plenke, ty prav. Poetomu mne i xochestsya na kakie nibud' kursy poyti chtoby snizit' procent braka.

[W_z_rd]

Karen, a zachem tebe kursi ? Est` zhe kucha literaturi po fotografii, kupi pochitay. Ya goda dva nazad kupil neploxuyu knizhku: "The photographer's handbook" John Hedgecoe. Nichego osobennogo, est` gorazdo bolee xoroshie knigi, no i etogo dlya nachala vpolne dostatochno. konkretno, chemu ti xochesh nauchitsya na krsax ? ekspoziciyu pravil`no stavit`, rakurs pravil`no vybirat`, kompoziciyu sosravlyat` ? Razbirat`sya v razlichnoy fototexnike ? Vse eto est` v knigax ili na kraynyak v internete.
Ya snimayu na plenku. Kamera - Ricoh KR5, 6-tiletney davnosti, manual, eksponometr sistemi TTL. S ekspoziciey nikogda problem ne bivaet. problemi s drugim - kuda otdavat` na proyavku ? Obichnie laboratorii - eto prosto koshmar, a prof. laboratorii stoyat dorogo, "za kaif" tuda ne poshlesh. Samomu proyavlyat` cvetnuyu plenku po-moemu nevozmozhno voobshe - nuzhna dorogostoyashaja apparatura, tak chto ostaetsya BW. No kak-to ne xochetsya sebya im ogranichivat`, xotja BW ya uvazhayu. :rolleyes:

A PhSh - eto vsego lish instrument, vse zavisit ot togo kak umelo mozhesh im pol`zovat`sya, no konechno on chudes ne sovershaet. Esli chto-to bezbozhno peresvetil, k primeru - nikakim PhSh ne ispravish.

[groul]

Esli chto-to bezbozhno peresvetil, k primeru - nikakim PhSh ne ispravish.

Vot i ya pro tozhe

Knigi eto xorosho, no u menya durackij "xasyat" zabrasyvat' na polovine :( vsegda naydetsya kakoe nibud' vazhnoe delo...