restrictions on INLINE statement

greka · Jun 11, 2004, 11:04

Does anybody know where can be found the list with all available restrictions on INLINE functions for latest C/C++ standards?

thank you.

Agregat · Jun 11, 2004, 12:24

3.2. par 3. : An inline function shall be defined in every translation unit in which it is used.
3.6.1 par 3: A program that declares main to be inline or static is ill-formed.
7.1.2 par 2: A function declaration (8.3.5, 9.3, 11.4) with an inline specifier declares an inline function. The inline specifier indicates to the implementation that inline substitution of the function body at the point of call is to be preferred to the usual function call mechanism. An implementation is not required to perform this
inline substitution at the point of call; however, even if this inline substitution is omitted, the other rules for inline functions defined by 7.1.2 shall still be respected.
7.1.2 par 3: A function defined within a class definition is an inline function. The inline specifier shall not appear on a block scope function declaration. If the inline specifier is used in a friend declaration, that declaration shall be a definition or the function shall have previously been declared inline.
7.1.2. par 4: An inline function shall be defined in every translation unit in which it is used and shall have exactly the
same definition in every case (3.2). [Note: a call to the inline function may be encountered before its defi-
nition appears in the translation unit. ] If a function with external linkage is declared inline in one translation
unit, it shall be declared inline in all translation units in which it appears; no diagnostic is required. An inline function with external linkage shall have the same address in all translation units. A static local variable in an extern inline function always refers to the same object. A string literal in an extern inline function is the same object in different translation units.

Это основное из C++ stnadard working draft. Есть еще несколько вхождений, но они не так важны.

**Hans Andersen** · Jun 11, 2004, 12:36

Why don't you gather all of the information form the latest c++ standard?
Btw, the inline and register keywords has proved to be meaningless and probably will be removed from the standard in the future.

Agregat · Jun 11, 2004, 12:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hans Andersen

Why don't you gather all of the information form the latest c++ standard?
Btw, the inline and register keywords has proved to be meaningless and probably will be removed from the standard in the future.

Уважаемый, Ганс Андерсен, не могли бы вы мне показать документ, который предлагает убрать эти слова из C++0x стандарта.

Г-н. Казарян: http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/ тут есть draft стандарта. Сам стандарт стоит 18$ можете приобрести

greka · Jun 12, 2004, 11:24

спасибо, Агрегат.

2 Hans Andersen: beleive you or not - the location of "latest c++ standard" is not known to me

Agregat · Jun 12, 2004, 19:55

Г-н. Григорян сам стандарт продается, как я сказал за 18$
но Latest draft можно скачать, по линку, что я постнул.

**Hans Andersen** · Jun 13, 2004, 11:21

Agregat, o tom chto inline budet ubran iz c++ ja chital v c++ users journal a year ago. Nu dejstvitel'no inline keyword utratila svoju znachimost' uje davno.

Greka, I have year 98's standard, but it is already too old and would be nice to have 2003's one. What I suggest is you ask your boss to buy an electronic version of latest c++ standard. ...and do not forget to send me a copy of it (for the idea)

Agregat · Jun 13, 2004, 19:15

CUJ это конечно хорошо, но на сайте, что я постнул выше - есть нормативные документы и предложения в стандарт. Я читал большинство из них и подобного не встречал

И в догонку, там же, повторюсь, есть черновой вариант нового стандарта, что даже новее чем '03 стандарт

.

**Hans Andersen** · Jun 14, 2004, 15:30

ja ochen' rad chto dkuug takoj xoroshij sajt,
no vajno li gde pishet Matt Austern?

Agregat · Jun 14, 2004, 19:28

Да, в CUJ Остерн может писать все свои соображения, а на официальном сайте workgroup - а стандарта языка С++ все не пишется.

Jun 11, 2004, 11:04	#1
greka Administrator Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: @work Posts: 5,347 Rep Power: 10 Reputation: 23	restrictions on INLINE statement Does anybody know where can be found the list with all available restrictions on INLINE functions for latest C/C++ standards? thank you. __________________ И повешенные могут качаться в неположенную сторону. /С.Е.Лец/

Jun 11, 2004, 12:24	#2
Agregat Грустно... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Там, где всегда идут дожди Posts: 21,614 Rep Power: 11 Reputation: 202	3.2. par 3. : An inline function shall be defined in every translation unit in which it is used. 3.6.1 par 3: A program that declares main to be inline or static is ill-formed. 7.1.2 par 2: A function declaration (8.3.5, 9.3, 11.4) with an inline specifier declares an inline function. The inline specifier indicates to the implementation that inline substitution of the function body at the point of call is to be preferred to the usual function call mechanism. An implementation is not required to perform this inline substitution at the point of call; however, even if this inline substitution is omitted, the other rules for inline functions defined by 7.1.2 shall still be respected. 7.1.2 par 3: A function defined within a class definition is an inline function. The inline specifier shall not appear on a block scope function declaration. If the inline specifier is used in a friend declaration, that declaration shall be a definition or the function shall have previously been declared inline. 7.1.2. par 4: An inline function shall be defined in every translation unit in which it is used and shall have exactly the same definition in every case (3.2). [Note: a call to the inline function may be encountered before its defi- nition appears in the translation unit. ] If a function with external linkage is declared inline in one translation unit, it shall be declared inline in all translation units in which it appears; no diagnostic is required. An inline function with external linkage shall have the same address in all translation units. A static local variable in an extern inline function always refers to the same object. A string literal in an extern inline function is the same object in different translation units. Это основное из C++ stnadard working draft. Есть еще несколько вхождений, но они не так важны. __________________ http://аvitya.livejournal.com Хотели, как лучше, а получилось даже хуже... Лозунг шахматиста: На каждый шах - ответим матом!

Jun 12, 2004, 11:24	#5
greka Administrator Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: @work Posts: 5,347 Rep Power: 10 Reputation: 23	спасибо, Агрегат. 2 Hans Andersen: beleive you or not - the location of "latest c++ standard" is not known to me __________________ И повешенные могут качаться в неположенную сторону. /С.Е.Лец/

Jun 12, 2004, 19:55	#6
Agregat Грустно... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Там, где всегда идут дожди Posts: 21,614 Rep Power: 11 Reputation: 202	Г-н. Григорян сам стандарт продается, как я сказал за 18$ но Latest draft можно скачать, по линку, что я постнул. __________________ http://аvitya.livejournal.com Хотели, как лучше, а получилось даже хуже... Лозунг шахматиста: На каждый шах - ответим матом!

Jun 13, 2004, 19:15	#8
Agregat Грустно... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Там, где всегда идут дожди Posts: 21,614 Rep Power: 11 Reputation: 202	CUJ это конечно хорошо, но на сайте, что я постнул выше - есть нормативные документы и предложения в стандарт. Я читал большинство из них и подобного не встречал И в догонку, там же, повторюсь, есть черновой вариант нового стандарта, что даже новее чем '03 стандарт . __________________ http://аvitya.livejournal.com Хотели, как лучше, а получилось даже хуже... Лозунг шахматиста: На каждый шах - ответим матом!

Jun 11, 2004, 12:36	#3
Hans Andersen the mochinger Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Paranoid Android, @10:50 Posts: 1,769 Rep Power: 7 Reputation: 109	Why don't you gather all of the information form the latest c++ standard? Btw, the inline and register keywords has proved to be meaningless and probably will be removed from the standard in the future.

Jun 13, 2004, 11:21	#7
Hans Andersen the mochinger Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Paranoid Android, @10:50 Posts: 1,769 Rep Power: 7 Reputation: 109	Agregat, o tom chto inline budet ubran iz c++ ja chital v c++ users journal a year ago. Nu dejstvitel'no inline keyword utratila svoju znachimost' uje davno. Greka, I have year 98's standard, but it is already too old and would be nice to have 2003's one. What I suggest is you ask your boss to buy an electronic version of latest c++ standard. ...and do not forget to send me a copy of it (for the idea)

Jun 14, 2004, 15:30	#9
Hans Andersen the mochinger Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Paranoid Android, @10:50 Posts: 1,769 Rep Power: 7 Reputation: 109	ja ochen' rad chto dkuug takoj xoroshij sajt, no vajno li gde pishet Matt Austern? __________________ The flower that blooms in adversity is the most rare and beautiful of all.

Jun 14, 2004, 19:28	#10
Agregat Грустно... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Там, где всегда идут дожди Posts: 21,614 Rep Power: 11 Reputation: 202	Да, в CUJ Остерн может писать все свои соображения, а на официальном сайте workgroup - а стандарта языка С++ все не пишется. __________________ http://аvitya.livejournal.com Хотели, как лучше, а получилось даже хуже... Лозунг шахматиста: На каждый шах - ответим матом!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode