[Much]

inch vor mekn phototexnikaic hasklanum a. ete ha ogneq xndrum em glux hanel, es tenc el chhaskaca sranc tarberutyunn (baci nranic vor irnc obyektivneri tipern en urish). Inchn a iranc trberutyunn vor gnern tenc tarber en?

[TasteMyLipstick]

Without going deep into technical details.

Take D80. It's a light version of D200, which is a serious pro camera.

D40x is a step forward for the D40, which is an amateur camera.

[Medved Kosolapiy]

D40x мусор зеркальный

D80 тоже мусор тока на пару классов выше ))))

[Much]

Originally Posted by Medved Kosolapiy

D40x мусор зеркальный

D80 тоже мусор тока на пару классов выше ))))

isk inch karajarkes et kargi Canon 400D? kam urish inch tarberakner kan? Du inchov es nkarum?

[Medved Kosolapiy]

Canon 30D + Canon 24-70 L IS USM
400D ... тоже ниче, байц ет классиц ет гни Nikon D50 em havane )

[Much]

Originally Posted by Medved Kosolapiy

Canon 30D + Canon 24-70 L IS USM
400D ... тоже ниче, байц ет классиц ет гни Nikon D50 em havane )

es el skzbic Canon ei havanel, bayc.., Canon-n u Nikon-n ogtagortsum en Sony-i sensornern, Nikon-n CCD sensorner, Canon-n CMOS, vorn shumneri tesaketic aveli vat vichakum a gtnvum CCD-nern. Bayc sa zut teoria a! henc dra hamr el es praktika unecox mardkan xorhurdi kariqn ei zgum. shat shnorhakal em vor ardzaganqeciq

[Intel]

Since you're asking that question then you're suited for D40x. Take a look at oponent models from Canon, they shoot better quality then Nikon products, but if you have serious intensions save some money and by Nikon D300, it really rocks !!!

2 TasteMyLipstick > Actually, D200 is not a pro cam at all, it's a really serious but a semi-pro cam nevertheless.

[TasteMyLipstick]

Originally Posted by Intel

2 TasteMyLipstick > Actually, D200 is not a pro cam at all, it's a really serious but a semi-pro cam nevertheless.

Oh, really? What is the definition of a decent pro camera then?

For me is low noise, ISO up to 3200 and shutter speed up to 1/8000. Few professionals may need more.

About CCD vs CMOS. Recently both Nikon and Sony stopped using CCD technology. Both Sony A700 and Nikon D3/300 were based on CMOS technology, while their previous models like A100 and D200 are based on CCD technology.

My own experience with Nikon and Canon cameras makes me to choose Nikon, although quality of Canon D5 still amazes me.

So, no matter what kind of DSLR camera you have, Nikon or Canon or anything else, you can produce excellent images. Camera is no more but a tool. The rest is in your hands.

[Much]

So what about Sony Alpha DSLR-A100?

[TasteMyLipstick]

P.S. I was recently choosing a new DSLR for myself and came up with this one Pentax K10D.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/spec...entax_k10d.asp

By the way, it won the TIPA Awards in 2007 as a *Best D-SLR Expert*.

http://www.tipa.com/awa_detail_2007....&-KeyValue=110

[Intel]

Originally Posted by TasteMyLipstick

Oh, really? What is the definition of a decent pro camera then?

Oh, I don't care about it actually, accept it as my IMHO.

Ah, yes, I've forgot to mention,
Guys from Wikipedia and, from dpreview think the same

P.S. Why you allways try to fight me?

[TasteMyLipstick]

Originally Posted by Intel

P.S. Why you allways try to fight me?

Fight you? Dear, now that you wrote it I can say that your ego amazes me. I have no idea who you are and I hardly ever think of your existence.

[ByTheWay]

Olympus тоже очень качественный фотоапарат

[ByTheWay]

OLYMPUS FE240 Black

• 7.1 мегапикселей
• Объектив с 5x оптическим зумом (эквив. 38-190 мм для формата 35 мм)
• ЖК-монитор с диагональю 6.4 см/2.5 ”
• Стильный металлический корпус
• 15 сюжетных программ
• Режим высокого значения ISO
• Функция записи видеороликов со звуком (30 кадров/сек, VGA)