![]() |
![]() | #1 |
Moderator Join Date: 09 2001 Location: South Korea, Gumi
Posts: 7,699
Blog Entries: 16 Downloads: 102 Uploads: 34
Reputation: 561 | 6 | ![]()
12 November 2004 Marina del Rey (November 12, 2004) – The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) announced that its new inter-registrar domain name transfer policy has gone into effect. The new policy was created through ICANN's consensus-based, bottom-up policy development process and approved unanimously by both ICANN's Generic Names Supporting Organisation (GNSO) and its Board of Directors. Similar to how telephone number portability works in many countries, enhanced domain name portability will provide for greater consumer and business choice, enabling domain name registrants to select the registrar that offers the best services and price. The new policy also simplifies and standardises the process to prevent abuses and provide clearer user information about the transfer process and options. The policy was originally announced on July 12, 2004. Central to the new policy and its efforts to provide strong protections against unauthorised transfers and to facilitate choice in domain name registration, all registrars are now required to use a clear standardised form of authorisation that provides for the express consent of the domain name registrant prior to the initiation of any transfer. Additional policy elements include the following (please refer to the full policy available at http://www.icann.org/transfers/ for details):
A recent report by the OECD concluded that 'ICANN's reform of the market structure for the registration of generic top level domain names has been very successful. The division between registry and registrar functions has created a competitive market that has lowered prices and encouraged innovation. The initial experience with competition at the registry level, in association with a successful process to introduce new gTLDs, has also shown positive results.' Domain name users also have benefited from ICANN's implementation of a Redemption Grace Period Service that provides a 30-day period for domain name holders to reclaim their names if deleted unintentionally from a registry database. Through ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), established in 1999, more than 10,000 domain name disputes also have been efficiently and cost effectively resolved. http://www.icann.org/announcements/a...nt-12nov04.htm |
![]() |
![]() | #2 | |
Moderator Join Date: 10 2001 Location: Yerevan
Posts: 5,466
Blog Entries: 1 Downloads: 1 Uploads: 0
Reputation: 110 | 5 | ![]()
черт черт черт и сюда лезут. Quote:
Не получится Интернет Мозг человечества его НЕЛЬЗА контролировать из одного центра Даешь свободу, скажем нет тоталитаризму и произволу интербюрократов !! Все бюрократы международного масштаба должны быть выбраны свободными и прямыми выборами с участием всех Землян !! | |
![]() |
![]() | #3 | |
VIP Роджер Join Date: 08 2002 Location: Yereven Age: 54
Posts: 4,462
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0
Reputation: 10 | 4 | ![]() Quote:
| |
![]() |
![]() | #8 | |
VIP Роджер Join Date: 08 2002 Location: Yereven Age: 54
Posts: 4,462
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0
Reputation: 10 | 4 | ![]() Quote:
The root DNS servers are essential to the function of the Internet, as so many protocols use DNS, either directly or indirectly. They are potentially points of failure for the entire Internet. For this reason, there are 13 named root servers worldwide: the maximum possible using the DNS protocol with the minimum guaranteed IP datagram size. They are housed in multiple sites with high bandwidth access, to try to prevent attacks such as distributed denial-of-service attacks. Most of these single-site installations are still in the United States. Usually each DNS server in a given site is actually a cluster of servers behind a load-balancing set of routers. However, a number of root servers lie outside the United States: i.root-servers.net is in Stockholm k.root-servers.net is in Amsterdam and London m.root-servers.net is in Tokyo The modern trend is to use anycast to give resilience and to balance load across a wide geographic area. For example, both f.root-servers.net and k.root-servers.net are served using anycast from a number of sites worldwide. The use of anycast has allowed the growth of non-U.S. root DNS servers until most DNS root instances are outside the U.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_root_zone http://root-servers.org/
__________________ Ignorantia non est argumentum /Отрицание не есть доказательство/ | |
![]() |