10.08.2011, 06:05  #1 
Младенец Join Date: 09 2010 Location: Russia
Posts: 4
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0
Reputation: 0  0 
1. Master Theory  relativistic theory, because it is the same problem ("Electrodynamics of moving material bodies"), which solved the Einstein. 2. In Master Theory time is absolutely (absent "Twin Paradox"), than it differs from Einstein's Special Relativity Theory (SRT). A transverse (to the direction of motion) scale in Einstein's theory are absolute . But this difference has profound implications. (For example: in Master Theory are absent "Twin Paradox" and "Ehrenfest's Paradox".) 3. Author of Master Theory (Alexander V. Masterov) has proved that the problem (that are solved by Einstein) has an infinite number of solutions. SRT  only one of this infinite number of solutions. Where did these solutions? The longitudinal scales of SRT (along the direction of motion) are relative and depends on the relative velocity, whereas (by default) are the absolute transverse (to the direction of motion) scales. The author of Master Theory are assume a regarding of the transverse scope, that let has at its disposal a free parameter. For each value this parameter to can build a individual Theory of Relativity. This theory will be equal footing with Einstein's theory. Among this infinite number of theories discovered one in which time is absolute. The author named it  "Master Theory". 4. As Master Theory is a solution of the same problem (that Einstein's theory), then all the experimental results that confirm SRT  confirmed by Master Theory. The exception is fact of relativistic dilation time, which today has not been experimentally proved. 5. In Master Theory to exist absoluteness of: a. light's speed; b. acceleration (which can be measured indirectly through a mass attached to a spring, for example); c. number (absent "Ehrenfest's Paradox"); 6. Master Theory (as against SRT) is valid in all reference frames (not only in inertial). 7. In Master Theory identified two types of coordinates: real and visual: a. realcoordinates obey the Galilean Transformations, and can be calculated by integrating an acceleration; b. visualcoordinates determined by the properties of EMF and can be calculated from a realcoordinates; c. in Master Theory defined the inverse transformations coordinates (from a visualcoordinates to a realcoordinates). __________________________________________________________________________________ Master Theory (edition 2) Consider a light clock with a pair of vertical mirrors (one on our left, the other  on the right) and a beam of photons between them:  distance between the mirrors  period of the clock: Now let the observer move with a speed (right to left and back) (). The clock (in observer's frame) will move as follows: Oscillogram: Because the speed of light in all a inertial reference frames (IRF) is invariable, then (from the viewpoint of an observer) time of flight of the photon beam from mirror to mirror in different directions will be different, inasmuch as moving in one direction  move opposite to the mirror (flight time is lesser), а moving in the opposite direction  will in pursuit of mirror (flight time is bigger). Total time (there and back) are changing: How can this be? This is so indeed: the clock nothing to do with the observer do not have. Any properties of the clock can not depend of acrobatic exercises of the observer. Conclusion: a visualdistance between the mirrors changes: Consequently: ______________________________________________ The longitudinal scale is clear. We proceed to investigate the crossscale. For this we consider the light clock with a pair of horizontal mirrors (one  from the bottom, the other  from the top): Again: and the observer move. Oscillogram: Light will travel long distances over the same time. But light can not move faster "light's speed". Again we change a visualdistance between the mirrors changes: From the Pythagorean theorem follows: next:  Compare: MasterTheory: SRT: All theories: For a result is Einstein's Theory of Relativity. For a result is Master Theory. For each of the intermediate values () we can construct theories have, and each of the which (infinitely many) will have as much right to exist as the SRT. But only in the case  time is absolutely, therefore only Master Theory can claim the right to approximate the property of space and time. All other theories (including SRT)  false. Coordinate transformation of Master Theory In Master Theory acceleration is an absolute for all IRF (measured by a spring with a small mass, for example). By Integrating the acceleration we can calculate the actual speed (relative to the initial velocity): By integrating the velocity we can calculate the realcoordinates (relative to the initial coordinates): Given the expression: we can obtain the dependence of the realspeed from the visualspeed: and the visualspeed from the realspeed: Consequently, the visualcoordinates are computed as follows: here  the visualtime. (And in general: all of the visual position and time followed simbol ', with the exception of speed. Ie: .) Т.е.: The realcoordinates are computed through the visualcoordinates as follows: We make the realtime's derivative of the visualtime: This formula is describes the Doppler's effect which come out from the finite speed of propagation of electromagnetic wave. This formula implies that the visualcoordinates to make sense until the realspeed at which the observed object is deleted, does not exceed the speed of light. Objects, the actual velocity of which (relative to the observer) is equal to or greater than the light's speed is a beam of neutrinos and not interact with slow matter. 
22.08.2011, 17:57  #2 
Младенец Join Date: 09 2010 Location: Russia
Posts: 4
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0
Reputation: 0  0  Quark Relativistic Maxwell Since any differential operator is local (in close proximity), and (consequently) a finiteness of a propagation speed of the fields (in infinitely small distance) can not make adjustments to the equation. Therefore, Maxwell's equations in differential form in the context of the Master Theory would not be changed in comparison with the classics. Namely: But integral Maxwell (because of a nonlocality of a integral operators) will have a fundamentally different (nonclassical, but  relativistic) form. This is explained by the fact that Stokes' and Gauss' theorems: and valid only for stationary fields, or fields, the speed of which is infinite. Application of these theorems (for the output of the integral form of Maxwell's equations) can not be correct in the relativistic case. 
25.08.2011, 06:25  #3 
Младенец Join Date: 09 2010 Location: Russia
Posts: 4
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0
Reputation: 0  0 
Suppose we have a closedloop surface S, which have a characteristic size L. Then the integral expressions of the classical Maxwell's Equations: valid only in cases where a characteristic time of variation of the fields (and electric charge) in these equations are much smaller than L/c. A similar can be said about the other pair of expressions. 
Thread Tools  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Master Theory  Masterov  Science and Education  0  08.09.2010 14:48 
The small boy and his Zen master  Hrach_Techie  By the fire...  6  30.04.2007 19:44 
FAST AV master  Solger  Sell and Purchase  2  13.12.2004 11:57 
web master  BlackMoon  Jobs  0  23.04.2003 07:59 
Master of Orion 3!!!  Завен Григорян  Games  1  29.10.2002 12:56 
На правах рекламы:  
