Проооооостенькая задачка :d

[greka]

	int sCount;
	unsigned int shiftedMask;

	sCount = 0L;
	shiftedMask = 0xFFFFFFFF >> (32 - sCount);

угадайте с 3-х раз чему будет равен "shiftedMask ".

P.S. советую ответ проверить на реальном приложении

[Tumanyan]

Originally posted by Greco El

	int sCount;
	unsigned int shiftedMask;

	sCount = 0L;
	shiftedMask = 0xFFFFFFFF >> (32 - sCount);

угадайте с 3-х раз чему будет равен "shiftedMask ".

P.S. советую ответ проверить на реальном приложении

Assuming the platform is x86, shiftedMask is undefined. Here is what standard says:

The results are undefined if the right operand of a shift expression is negative or if the right operand is greater than or equal to the number of bits in the (promoted) left operand.

sizeof(unsigned int) = 32 ==> result of shift is undefined.

[analyst]

Обясните плз

shiftedMask = 0xFFFFFFFF >> (32 - sCount); [/B]

[W_z_rd]

Depends on platform, compiler, processor, etc.

[DaNYer]

"depends" is the best answer for everything.

[greka]

Originally posted by W_z_rd
Depends on platform, compiler, processor, etc.

it does not depend on compiler.
I checked that up for Borland compiler, too.

[greka]

Originally posted by analyst
Обясните плз

shiftedMask = 0xFFFFFFFF >> (32 - sCount); [/B]

это сдвиг маски из 32-х двоичных единиц вправо на 32 бита.


ответ Tumanyan-а разъясняет все.

Мистика. Фантастика.

[greka]

лишь уточню: вышесказанное относится только к типу "int32"

если я сдвину "unsigned char" на "8" бит вправо, получу законный "0".


takie pirogi.
t.e. tortiki.

[nm]

pered tem kak sdvigat' priwedi k unsigned .....

[nm]

Originally posted by nm
pered tem kak sdvigat' priwedi k unsigned .....

ja imel w widu chto-to tipa

((unsigned int)0xFFFFFFFF) >> bitcount ...


dlja signed chisla (proc/kompiler) objazan delat' rasshirenie znakowogo bita (starshego) i hren ego znaet kak imenno ono eto sdelaet ... dependz, kak gritsja .... w sluchae sdviga unsigned chisla dolzhno wse byt' tip top


effiop twoju .... poprobowal ;)
gcc version 3.3.1 [FreeBSD] 20030711 (prerelease)

--------------
int sCount;
unsigned int shiftedMask;

sCount = 0L;
shiftedMask = ((unsigned int)0xFFFFFFFF) >> 32;

wot eto daet
warning pri kompiljacii
warning: right shift count >= width of type

no predskazuemyj otwet 0x00 :))) - kak pokazywaet disassemble - eto wychislil kompiljator (prawil'no, tak i dolzhno byt':)
--------

poshli dal'she :)
int sCount;
unsigned int shiftedMask;
sCount = 0L;
shiftedMask = 0xFFFFFFFF >> (32 - sCount);

wot eto daet rezul'tat 2^31-1

tak tebja . smotriw w disassembly, notacija ATT (porjadok argumentow prjamo protivopolozhnyj intelowskomu :)))) t.e. mov SOURCE, DESTINATION :)

.....skip....
// sCount == 0
0x80484e4 <main+16>:    movl   $0x0,0xfffffffc(%ebp)
// 32 -> ecx
0x80484eb <main+23>:    mov    $0x20,%eax
0x80484f0 <main+28>:    mov    %eax,%ecx
// 32 - sCount -> ecx
0x80484f2 <main+30>:    sub    0xfffffffc(%ebp),%ecx
0x80484f5 <main+33>:    mov    $0xffffffff,%eax
0x80484fa <main+38>:    shr    %cl,%eax
.....cut....

ahha. problema processora? smotrim ;)
gcc version 3.2, sparc-sun-solaris2.7
dlja tex kto bachit na sparkowskom asme :)

// pochistit' jachejku w steke  sCount
0x10678 <main+12>:      clr  [ %fp + -20 ]
// 32 -> o1
0x1067c <main+16>:      mov  0x20, %o1
// sCount -> o0
0x10680 <main+20>:      ld  [ %fp + -20 ], %o0
// 32 - sCount -> o1
0x10684 <main+24>:      sub  %o1, %o0, %o1
// -1 !!!!! -> o0
0x10688 <main+28>:      mov  -1, %o0
// o0 >> o1 -> o0
0x1068c <main+32>:      srl  %o0, %o1, %o0
// o0 -> shiftedMask
0x10690 <main+36>:      st  %o0, [ %fp + -24 ]

wobshem sparkowskij kod nagljadno pokazal w chem imenno problema - ono schitaet,chto 0xFFFFFFFF - eto -1, dazhe pri tom chto ono objavleno unsigned ;)


wobshem standart praw - jawno najdetsja kompil', kotoryj re**** eto kak-to po swoemu :)))

[greka]

Originally posted by nm
pered tem kak sdvigat' priwedi k unsigned .....

pered tem, kak davat' sovet, ubedis', chto on rabotaet

[greka]

bystryj gonzales.
spasibo za intro v sparkovskiy ASM.


oba kompillera dali odin i tot je rezul'tat - "-1", verno ?
tak chto eto ne ficha kompillera, skoree vsego.


predlagayu proverit' eto, sdvigaya na 33 bita.

[CyberJoe]

Эх подзабыл я сдвиги надо подучить...